<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 614 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204629</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to disallow cenvat credit on certain goods claimed as capital goods by the appellants due to insufficient evidence supporting their claim. The imposition of penalty was set aside as there was no intent to evade revenue payment. The appeal was dismissed based on findings that the goods were primarily used for fabricating structures in the factory, lacking concrete proof of alternative uses like making pipelines and storage tanks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 18:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178159" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 614 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204629</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to disallow cenvat credit on certain goods claimed as capital goods by the appellants due to insufficient evidence supporting their claim. The imposition of penalty was set aside as there was no intent to evade revenue payment. The appeal was dismissed based on findings that the goods were primarily used for fabricating structures in the factory, lacking concrete proof of alternative uses like making pipelines and storage tanks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204629</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>