<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 782 - ITAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204620</link>
    <description>Expenditure incurred to discharge a corporate guarantee given for a subsidiary can qualify as a business deduction where it is commercially expedient and incurred to protect the assessee&#039;s business interests. Here, the guarantees were issued in the course of business, the subsidiary supplied materials essential to the assessee&#039;s operations, and the memorandum authorised such support. The payment was held allowable as business expenditure or business loss, and the absence of direct income generation did not make it non-deductible. The accounting treatment in the books was not determinative of tax character, so the disallowance was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2026 17:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178150" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 782 - ITAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204620</link>
      <description>Expenditure incurred to discharge a corporate guarantee given for a subsidiary can qualify as a business deduction where it is commercially expedient and incurred to protect the assessee&#039;s business interests. Here, the guarantees were issued in the course of business, the subsidiary supplied materials essential to the assessee&#039;s operations, and the memorandum authorised such support. The payment was held allowable as business expenditure or business loss, and the absence of direct income generation did not make it non-deductible. The accounting treatment in the books was not determinative of tax character, so the disallowance was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204620</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>