<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 860 - ITAT BANGALORE-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204619</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals by the assessee, holding that the refusal of registration was not justified, there was no escapement of income, and the consequential reopening was bad in law. The change of status from a firm to AOP was also not justified. The appeals for the assessment years 1998-99 to 2000-01 were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 16:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178149" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 860 - ITAT BANGALORE-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204619</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals by the assessee, holding that the refusal of registration was not justified, there was no escapement of income, and the consequential reopening was bad in law. The change of status from a firm to AOP was also not justified. The appeals for the assessment years 1998-99 to 2000-01 were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204619</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>