<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 216 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204618</link>
    <description>The judgment addressed the confiscation of a non-Basmati rice consignment and penalties imposed on involved parties. The Tribunal upheld penalties on M/s Phonix Traders under Section 114 but set aside penalties under Section 114AA. Similarly, penalties on an individual associated with the traders and the CHA firm were also set aside. The Tribunal emphasized intentional misdeclaration actions by exporters and aimed to ensure fairness and justice in the case adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 16:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178148" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 216 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204618</link>
      <description>The judgment addressed the confiscation of a non-Basmati rice consignment and penalties imposed on involved parties. The Tribunal upheld penalties on M/s Phonix Traders under Section 114 but set aside penalties under Section 114AA. Similarly, penalties on an individual associated with the traders and the CHA firm were also set aside. The Tribunal emphasized intentional misdeclaration actions by exporters and aimed to ensure fairness and justice in the case adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204618</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>