<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 628 - Karnataka High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204584</link>
    <description>The court held that directors of a private limited company were liable under Section 179 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, due to their gross neglect in failing to file returns for over a decade, leading to significant dues to statutory authorities. The court clarified that liability under Section 179 could arise from any one of gross neglect, misfeasance, or breach of duty. Additionally, the court determined that &quot;tax&quot; under Section 179 did not include penalty and interest for directors, but the company itself was liable for all three components under Section 222. The petition was rejected, confirming the respondents&#039; order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 13:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178114" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 628 - Karnataka High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204584</link>
      <description>The court held that directors of a private limited company were liable under Section 179 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, due to their gross neglect in failing to file returns for over a decade, leading to significant dues to statutory authorities. The court clarified that liability under Section 179 could arise from any one of gross neglect, misfeasance, or breach of duty. Additionally, the court determined that &quot;tax&quot; under Section 179 did not include penalty and interest for directors, but the company itself was liable for all three components under Section 222. The petition was rejected, confirming the respondents&#039; order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204584</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>