<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 439 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204581</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Order-in-original that classified the services under &#039;Management, maintenance or repair&#039; for service tax liability. The Tribunal remanded the matter for a fresh determination, emphasizing the importance of re-examining the classification issue in light of the factual matrix and principles of natural justice. The appeal was allowed on the grounds of remand, keeping all issues open for consideration without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 15:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178111" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 439 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204581</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Order-in-original that classified the services under &#039;Management, maintenance or repair&#039; for service tax liability. The Tribunal remanded the matter for a fresh determination, emphasizing the importance of re-examining the classification issue in light of the factual matrix and principles of natural justice. The appeal was allowed on the grounds of remand, keeping all issues open for consideration without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204581</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>