<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 561 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204573</link>
    <description>Rule 57-S(2)(c) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 applies only where waste and scrap arise from capital goods on which credit under Rule 57Q had actually been taken. The burden was on the department to prove such availment before demanding duty on the scrap, and the record did not establish credit during the disputed period. On that basis, the demand was held unsustainable and the order confirming duty and penalty was set aside, with consequential relief to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 14:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178105" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 561 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204573</link>
      <description>Rule 57-S(2)(c) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 applies only where waste and scrap arise from capital goods on which credit under Rule 57Q had actually been taken. The burden was on the department to prove such availment before demanding duty on the scrap, and the record did not establish credit during the disputed period. On that basis, the demand was held unsustainable and the order confirming duty and penalty was set aside, with consequential relief to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204573</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>