<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (5) TMI 582 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204562</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal in part, ruling that the disallowance of interest on Deep Discount Bonds under Section 43B of the Income Tax Act was not justified. The Tribunal held that the interest liability accrued annually under the mercantile system of accounting and was not covered by Section 43B. As a result, the disallowance of Rs. 6,08,03,230 was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 15:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178094" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (5) TMI 582 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204562</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal in part, ruling that the disallowance of interest on Deep Discount Bonds under Section 43B of the Income Tax Act was not justified. The Tribunal held that the interest liability accrued annually under the mercantile system of accounting and was not covered by Section 43B. As a result, the disallowance of Rs. 6,08,03,230 was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204562</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>