<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 598 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204558</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the application for waiver of pre-deposit of service tax, amounting to Rs. 5,63,333/-, along with interest and penalty. The decision was based on the applicant&#039;s ability to establish a prima facie case regarding the interpretation of maintenance or repair service under the Finance Act, 1994, during the relevant period. Despite the Revenue&#039;s argument that software in canned form should be considered goods, the Tribunal considered the confusion in interpretation highlighted in previous case law. The waiver was granted, and recovery was stayed during the appeal, emphasizing the importance of legal provisions and case law in tax liability determinations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 17:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178090" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 598 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204558</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the application for waiver of pre-deposit of service tax, amounting to Rs. 5,63,333/-, along with interest and penalty. The decision was based on the applicant&#039;s ability to establish a prima facie case regarding the interpretation of maintenance or repair service under the Finance Act, 1994, during the relevant period. Despite the Revenue&#039;s argument that software in canned form should be considered goods, the Tribunal considered the confusion in interpretation highlighted in previous case law. The waiver was granted, and recovery was stayed during the appeal, emphasizing the importance of legal provisions and case law in tax liability determinations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204558</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>