<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 285 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204552</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order setting aside duty demand and penalty imposed on imported goods through a courier agency. The Tribunal emphasized that when goods are imported through a courier agency, the agency can file the bill of entry on behalf of the importer-consignee, and the production of photocopies of the bill of entry by the respondents was deemed acceptable. The Tribunal found no valid reason to interfere with the Commissioner (Appeals) order and rejected the department&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 10:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178084" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 285 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204552</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order setting aside duty demand and penalty imposed on imported goods through a courier agency. The Tribunal emphasized that when goods are imported through a courier agency, the agency can file the bill of entry on behalf of the importer-consignee, and the production of photocopies of the bill of entry by the respondents was deemed acceptable. The Tribunal found no valid reason to interfere with the Commissioner (Appeals) order and rejected the department&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204552</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>