<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 43 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204546</link>
    <description>The High Court of Calcutta ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that the non-competition fee received was a capital receipt and not taxable. The Court criticized the Tribunal for questioning the transaction&#039;s genuineness without proper grounds and without allowing the appellant to substantiate the transaction&#039;s authenticity. The judgment emphasizes procedural fairness and factual evidence in tax assessments and appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 15:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178079" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 43 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204546</link>
      <description>The High Court of Calcutta ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that the non-competition fee received was a capital receipt and not taxable. The Court criticized the Tribunal for questioning the transaction&#039;s genuineness without proper grounds and without allowing the appellant to substantiate the transaction&#039;s authenticity. The judgment emphasizes procedural fairness and factual evidence in tax assessments and appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204546</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>