https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204530 An FIR could not be quashed merely because an earlier Archaeological Survey of India report had later been treated as inoperative between other parties. The earlier High Court order did not set aside that report; it only indicated it would not operate inter se those parties if a fresh report was made. The CBI was not a party to that proceeding, and the criminal case had already progressed through investigation, charge-sheet and framing of charges. The Court found that the challenge at that stage was not sustainable, leaving the trial court to decide the issues on evidence. The request to quash the FIR was rejected. en-us Tue, 25 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Jun 2011 18:13:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204530 An FIR could not be quashed merely because an earlier Archaeological Survey of India report had later been treated as inoperative between other parties. The earlier High Court order did not set aside that report; it only indicated it would not operate inter se those parties if a fresh report was made. The CBI was not a party to that proceeding, and the criminal case had already progressed through investigation, charge-sheet and framing of charges. The Court found that the challenge at that stage was not sustainable, leaving the trial court to decide the issues on evidence. The request to quash the FIR was rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 25 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204530