https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204528 The tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant due to the supplier's mistake leading to the misdeclaration in the Bill of Entry. As the misdeclaration was not intentional and the appellant provided correct details, no confiscation or penalty was warranted. The tribunal distinguished cases cited by the Revenue, emphasizing the unique circumstances of this case. The judgment was pronounced on 19-7-2010. en-us Mon, 19 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 22 Jul 2011 09:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204528 The tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant due to the supplier's mistake leading to the misdeclaration in the Bill of Entry. As the misdeclaration was not intentional and the appellant provided correct details, no confiscation or penalty was warranted. The tribunal distinguished cases cited by the Revenue, emphasizing the unique circumstances of this case. The judgment was pronounced on 19-7-2010. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 19 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204528