<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 587 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204521</link>
    <description>A pre-deposit waiver was considered for penalty imposed under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 in relation to a refund claim dispute. On the material placed, a prima facie case was found for waiver, so the Tribunal allowed waiver of pre-deposit of the penalty amount and stayed recovery of the penalty until disposal of the appeal. The operative effect was that enforcement of the penalty was kept in abeyance pending the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 14:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178054" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 587 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204521</link>
      <description>A pre-deposit waiver was considered for penalty imposed under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 in relation to a refund claim dispute. On the material placed, a prima facie case was found for waiver, so the Tribunal allowed waiver of pre-deposit of the penalty amount and stayed recovery of the penalty until disposal of the appeal. The operative effect was that enforcement of the penalty was kept in abeyance pending the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204521</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>