<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 585 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204519</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Kolkata upheld the penalty imposed on the Appellants for possessing Bangladeshi currencies under the Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal rejected the Appellants&#039; challenges regarding retracted statements, confiscation of foreign currencies, applicability of the Foreign Exchange (Regulations) Act, 1973, and legal precedents. The Tribunal found that the Appellants, acting as carriers exchanging currencies illegally, were liable for the penalties, leading to the dismissal of their appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 14:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178052" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 585 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204519</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Kolkata upheld the penalty imposed on the Appellants for possessing Bangladeshi currencies under the Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal rejected the Appellants&#039; challenges regarding retracted statements, confiscation of foreign currencies, applicability of the Foreign Exchange (Regulations) Act, 1973, and legal precedents. The Tribunal found that the Appellants, acting as carriers exchanging currencies illegally, were liable for the penalties, leading to the dismissal of their appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204519</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>