https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204490 The High Court allowed the appeal against the CESTAT order directing a deposit for appeal, noting the failure to consider the appellant's plea of financial hardship. The High Court quashed the CESTAT orders, directing reconsideration while emphasizing adherence to legal principles. The Court ordered the lifting of goods attachment and restoration of the appeal and stay application to CESTAT for simultaneous consideration. The judgment emphasized upholding natural justice and legal precedents, ultimately disposing of the appeal without costs. en-us Tue, 07 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 21 May 2011 18:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204490 The High Court allowed the appeal against the CESTAT order directing a deposit for appeal, noting the failure to consider the appellant's plea of financial hardship. The High Court quashed the CESTAT orders, directing reconsideration while emphasizing adherence to legal principles. The Court ordered the lifting of goods attachment and restoration of the appeal and stay application to CESTAT for simultaneous consideration. The judgment emphasized upholding natural justice and legal precedents, ultimately disposing of the appeal without costs. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 07 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204490