<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 559 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204489</link>
    <description>The Tribunal highlighted the delay in obtaining necessary COD clearance for pending appeals with substantial revenue stakes filed in November 2006. The Department had not made efforts to secure the clearance despite the high amounts involved. The Tribunal directed the Registrar to inform key officials and adjourned the appeals with a deadline for obtaining the required clearance. The judgment emphasized the importance of addressing the issue promptly and expediting the process to resolve the prolonged pendency of appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 17:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178024" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 559 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204489</link>
      <description>The Tribunal highlighted the delay in obtaining necessary COD clearance for pending appeals with substantial revenue stakes filed in November 2006. The Department had not made efforts to secure the clearance despite the high amounts involved. The Tribunal directed the Registrar to inform key officials and adjourned the appeals with a deadline for obtaining the required clearance. The judgment emphasized the importance of addressing the issue promptly and expediting the process to resolve the prolonged pendency of appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204489</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>