<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 202 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204481</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that the lands were agricultural and exempt from TDS under Section 194LA. The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, confirming the cancellation of the AO&#039;s demand for TDS and interest. Additionally, the Tribunal rejected the revenue&#039;s objection regarding the admissibility of fresh evidence, finding that the AO had been given a fair opportunity to comment on the evidence presented.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 13:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178016" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 202 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204481</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that the lands were agricultural and exempt from TDS under Section 194LA. The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, confirming the cancellation of the AO&#039;s demand for TDS and interest. Additionally, the Tribunal rejected the revenue&#039;s objection regarding the admissibility of fresh evidence, finding that the AO had been given a fair opportunity to comment on the evidence presented.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204481</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>