<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 366 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204480</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It emphasized the importance of the assessee proving the bonafide nature of explanations and disclosing all material facts. The Court found that the assessee had fulfilled this burden, leading to the dismissal of the appeal as no substantial question of law necessitated intervention.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 12:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178015" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 366 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204480</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It emphasized the importance of the assessee proving the bonafide nature of explanations and disclosing all material facts. The Court found that the assessee had fulfilled this burden, leading to the dismissal of the appeal as no substantial question of law necessitated intervention.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204480</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>