https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204473 Mandatory clearance from the Committee on Disputes was required before the central PSU's appeals could proceed, and the Tribunal dismissed the appeals after the appellant failed to produce that clearance despite three opportunities. A request for adjournment citing office workload did not cure the non-compliance, and there was no representation at the hearing. The connected stay applications were also dismissed on the same ground of failure to comply with the pre-requisite requirement. en-us Mon, 17 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Dec 2011 16:02:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204473 Mandatory clearance from the Committee on Disputes was required before the central PSU's appeals could proceed, and the Tribunal dismissed the appeals after the appellant failed to produce that clearance despite three opportunities. A request for adjournment citing office workload did not cure the non-compliance, and there was no representation at the hearing. The connected stay applications were also dismissed on the same ground of failure to comply with the pre-requisite requirement. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 17 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204473