<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 283 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204466</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) to set aside a penalty of Rs. 57,302 imposed under Section 11AC and rules of Central Excise and Cenvat Credit. The penalty was set aside due to unexplained shortage of goods without evidence of clandestine removal. The appeal against setting aside the penalty was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 15:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=178001" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 283 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204466</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) to set aside a penalty of Rs. 57,302 imposed under Section 11AC and rules of Central Excise and Cenvat Credit. The penalty was set aside due to unexplained shortage of goods without evidence of clandestine removal. The appeal against setting aside the penalty was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204466</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>