https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204462 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case involving allegations of under-valuation of goods and evasion of central excise duty, as well as the unauthorized use of another person's brand name on plywood sheets. The Tribunal found inconsistencies in the evidence and lack of concrete proof to support the allegations, ultimately setting aside the impugned order due to the revenue's failure to substantiate the claims. The decision emphasized the significance of substantial evidence in taxation disputes and the requirement to establish allegations conclusively. en-us Wed, 07 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Jun 2013 15:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204462 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case involving allegations of under-valuation of goods and evasion of central excise duty, as well as the unauthorized use of another person's brand name on plywood sheets. The Tribunal found inconsistencies in the evidence and lack of concrete proof to support the allegations, ultimately setting aside the impugned order due to the revenue's failure to substantiate the claims. The decision emphasized the significance of substantial evidence in taxation disputes and the requirement to establish allegations conclusively. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 07 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204462