<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 165 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204455</link>
    <description>The court ruled in this case that there is no estoppel against a person for filing a return if they are not subject to tax. The appellant was found to qualify as a &quot;credit institution&quot; under the Interest Tax Act, regardless of RBI recognition. Syndication fees and brokerages were classified as professional income, not chargeable interest. Although these fees were excluded from taxable income, the appellant was still liable for other interest received. The Assessing Officer was directed to exclude brokerage and syndication fees from the chargeable amount under the Act. The appeal was partly allowed, with no costs ordered.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 13:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177990" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 165 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204455</link>
      <description>The court ruled in this case that there is no estoppel against a person for filing a return if they are not subject to tax. The appellant was found to qualify as a &quot;credit institution&quot; under the Interest Tax Act, regardless of RBI recognition. Syndication fees and brokerages were classified as professional income, not chargeable interest. Although these fees were excluded from taxable income, the appellant was still liable for other interest received. The Assessing Officer was directed to exclude brokerage and syndication fees from the chargeable amount under the Act. The appeal was partly allowed, with no costs ordered.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204455</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>