<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 522 - ITAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204448</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed a penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for unexplained cash credit but canceled penalties related to bogus purchases and brokerage expenses. The penalty for unexplained cash credit was upheld as the assessee failed to substantiate the explanation. The penalty for bogus purchases was deleted as the Tribunal removed the corresponding addition. The penalty for brokerage expenses was canceled following a Supreme Court decision. The appeal was partly allowed, confirming the penalty for bogus gifts and directing the calculation of the minimum penalty. Penalties for the other additions were canceled.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 11:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177983" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 522 - ITAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204448</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed a penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for unexplained cash credit but canceled penalties related to bogus purchases and brokerage expenses. The penalty for unexplained cash credit was upheld as the assessee failed to substantiate the explanation. The penalty for bogus purchases was deleted as the Tribunal removed the corresponding addition. The penalty for brokerage expenses was canceled following a Supreme Court decision. The appeal was partly allowed, confirming the penalty for bogus gifts and directing the calculation of the minimum penalty. Penalties for the other additions were canceled.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204448</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>