<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 415 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204407</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the dropped demand confirmed by the lower Appellate Authority was dismissed. The dispute centered on the calculation of service tax payable for Management Consultancy services, with alleged short payment leading to penalties. The disagreement over the service tax rate application at the time of payment realization versus service provision was pivotal. The lower Appellate Authority and Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the decision to waive the demand, emphasizing the need for accurate tax calculations and timely payments based on evidence presented, ultimately ruling in favor of the respondent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2014 18:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177943" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 415 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204407</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the dropped demand confirmed by the lower Appellate Authority was dismissed. The dispute centered on the calculation of service tax payable for Management Consultancy services, with alleged short payment leading to penalties. The disagreement over the service tax rate application at the time of payment realization versus service provision was pivotal. The lower Appellate Authority and Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the decision to waive the demand, emphasizing the need for accurate tax calculations and timely payments based on evidence presented, ultimately ruling in favor of the respondent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204407</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>