<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 220 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204400</link>
    <description>Where booking documents, the proforma invoice and the receipt stipulate that the price prevailing on the date of billing applies, the purchaser bears an enhanced excise-duty-linked price if billing occurs after the duty increase. The absence of proof of deliberate delay, negligence or mala fide conduct by the dealer or manufacturer means the increased burden is not shifted to them. The Sale of Goods Act position was treated as consistent with recovery of the enhanced price from the customer, and the challenge to consumer commission findings therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 15:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177936" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 220 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204400</link>
      <description>Where booking documents, the proforma invoice and the receipt stipulate that the price prevailing on the date of billing applies, the purchaser bears an enhanced excise-duty-linked price if billing occurs after the duty increase. The absence of proof of deliberate delay, negligence or mala fide conduct by the dealer or manufacturer means the increased burden is not shifted to them. The Sale of Goods Act position was treated as consistent with recovery of the enhanced price from the customer, and the challenge to consumer commission findings therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204400</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>