<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 560 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204385</link>
    <description>The ITAT canceled the penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c) in all three instances as the assessee made bona fide claims with full disclosure, and there was no concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the penalties were deemed unjustified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2012 17:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177921" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 560 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204385</link>
      <description>The ITAT canceled the penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c) in all three instances as the assessee made bona fide claims with full disclosure, and there was no concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the penalties were deemed unjustified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204385</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>