<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 404 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204378</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the decision denying Cenvat credit refund for Engineering Consultancy services, emphasizing the need to consider relevant legal precedents. The appeal was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for re-evaluation, focusing on aspects of immunity from tax, unjust enrichment, and proper application of the law. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of avoiding unjust enrichment in protest matters and directed a thorough review before issuing a new decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 13:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177915" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 404 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204378</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the decision denying Cenvat credit refund for Engineering Consultancy services, emphasizing the need to consider relevant legal precedents. The appeal was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for re-evaluation, focusing on aspects of immunity from tax, unjust enrichment, and proper application of the law. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of avoiding unjust enrichment in protest matters and directed a thorough review before issuing a new decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204378</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>