<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 572 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204377</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted the appellant relief by waiving the penalty under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, due to the applicability of Section 80. Despite facing challenges in calculating service tax without an Accountant in the financial year 2007-08, the appellant demonstrated compliance by voluntarily paying the tax and filing the return. The Tribunal distinguished the appellant&#039;s circumstances from previous cases cited by the Departmental Representative, emphasizing the lack of sufficient staff for the appellant. Consequently, the penalty was waived, and the appeal was disposed of in the appellant&#039;s favor.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 13:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177914" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 572 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204377</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted the appellant relief by waiving the penalty under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, due to the applicability of Section 80. Despite facing challenges in calculating service tax without an Accountant in the financial year 2007-08, the appellant demonstrated compliance by voluntarily paying the tax and filing the return. The Tribunal distinguished the appellant&#039;s circumstances from previous cases cited by the Departmental Representative, emphasizing the lack of sufficient staff for the appellant. Consequently, the penalty was waived, and the appeal was disposed of in the appellant&#039;s favor.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204377</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>