https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204369 Non-compliance with a conditional stay order under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 can prevent an appeal from proceeding where the prescribed deposit is not made. Here, the Tribunal had directed deposit of 25% of the penalty within a specified time after remand, but the appellant failed to comply and no compliance report was filed when the matter was taken up. On that basis, the Tribunal treated the statutory deposit requirement and the earlier directions as binding and dismissed the appeals for persistent non-compliance. en-us Mon, 02 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Jun 2011 17:57:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204369 Non-compliance with a conditional stay order under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 can prevent an appeal from proceeding where the prescribed deposit is not made. Here, the Tribunal had directed deposit of 25% of the penalty within a specified time after remand, but the appellant failed to comply and no compliance report was filed when the matter was taken up. On that basis, the Tribunal treated the statutory deposit requirement and the earlier directions as binding and dismissed the appeals for persistent non-compliance. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 02 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204369