https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204347 The Tribunal set aside the duty demand in worksheet-1 due to insufficient documentary evidence. However, the duty demand in worksheet-2 for goods cleared under parallel invoices was upheld based on clear admission and evidence. The demand in worksheet-3 for consignments based on Lorry Receipts without corresponding invoices was rejected due to insufficient investigation and discrepancies. The penalty under Section 11AC was confirmed, with an option for the appellant to reduce the penalty amount by paying duty, interest, and penalty within a specified timeframe. en-us Fri, 01 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Jun 2013 10:13:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204347 The Tribunal set aside the duty demand in worksheet-1 due to insufficient documentary evidence. However, the duty demand in worksheet-2 for goods cleared under parallel invoices was upheld based on clear admission and evidence. The demand in worksheet-3 for consignments based on Lorry Receipts without corresponding invoices was rejected due to insufficient investigation and discrepancies. The penalty under Section 11AC was confirmed, with an option for the appellant to reduce the penalty amount by paying duty, interest, and penalty within a specified timeframe. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 01 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204347