<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 298 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204340</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the validity of proceedings under Sections 158BC and 158BD of the Income Tax Act, reversing the Tribunal&#039;s decision. It remitted the case back to the Tribunal for further examination of additions related to share capital, application money, and personal expenses. The High Court emphasized the relevance of evidence and inquiries post-search, supporting the justification for the proceedings and subsequent additions made by the JCIT.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177878" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 298 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204340</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the validity of proceedings under Sections 158BC and 158BD of the Income Tax Act, reversing the Tribunal&#039;s decision. It remitted the case back to the Tribunal for further examination of additions related to share capital, application money, and personal expenses. The High Court emphasized the relevance of evidence and inquiries post-search, supporting the justification for the proceedings and subsequent additions made by the JCIT.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204340</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>