<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 102 - ITAT, Mumbai</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204329</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that income from the sale of shares held as investments should be treated as short-term capital gain and not as business income. The CIT(A)&#039;s bifurcation based on a 30-day holding period was deemed incorrect. Regarding derivative transaction losses, the Tribunal decided in favor of the assessee, treating them as business losses for the entire assessment year 2006-07. As a result, the appeals and cross objections filed by the assessee were allowed, while the revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 23:50:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177867" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 102 - ITAT, Mumbai</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204329</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that income from the sale of shares held as investments should be treated as short-term capital gain and not as business income. The CIT(A)&#039;s bifurcation based on a 30-day holding period was deemed incorrect. Regarding derivative transaction losses, the Tribunal decided in favor of the assessee, treating them as business losses for the entire assessment year 2006-07. As a result, the appeals and cross objections filed by the assessee were allowed, while the revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204329</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>