<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 435 - ITAT, Lucknow</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204322</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT (A)&#039;s direction to refer the property to the D.V.O. for valuation under section 50C of the Income Tax Act. This decision emphasizes the importance of adhering to statutory provisions in resolving valuation disputes and accurately computing capital gains in property transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 16:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177861" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 435 - ITAT, Lucknow</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204322</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT (A)&#039;s direction to refer the property to the D.V.O. for valuation under section 50C of the Income Tax Act. This decision emphasizes the importance of adhering to statutory provisions in resolving valuation disputes and accurately computing capital gains in property transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204322</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>