<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 564 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204307</link>
    <description>Area-based exemption under Notification No. 50/2003-C.E. is confined to the specified factory location within the notified area, so shifting the unit from that location breaks continuity of the benefit and the denial was sustained. The small scale industry exemption claim, however, required factual verification and could not be rejected solely because it was not raised before the adjudicating authority; the matter was remanded for fresh examination after giving the assessee an opportunity to present its case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 16:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177847" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 564 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204307</link>
      <description>Area-based exemption under Notification No. 50/2003-C.E. is confined to the specified factory location within the notified area, so shifting the unit from that location breaks continuity of the benefit and the denial was sustained. The small scale industry exemption claim, however, required factual verification and could not be rejected solely because it was not raised before the adjudicating authority; the matter was remanded for fresh examination after giving the assessee an opportunity to present its case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204307</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>