<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 562 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204305</link>
    <description>Form-H issued by a merchant-exporter was treated as acceptable proof of export for goods cleared by an exempted unit, where the clearance fell within the Board&#039;s circular governing exports through merchant-exporters. The departmental objection that the export facility was unavailable on the facts was rejected because the evidentiary record supported the export claim and the nature of the clearance was correctly appreciated. On that basis, the denial of duty liability on the clearance was not sustained, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 11:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177845" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 562 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204305</link>
      <description>Form-H issued by a merchant-exporter was treated as acceptable proof of export for goods cleared by an exempted unit, where the clearance fell within the Board&#039;s circular governing exports through merchant-exporters. The departmental objection that the export facility was unavailable on the facts was rejected because the evidentiary record supported the export claim and the nature of the clearance was correctly appreciated. On that basis, the denial of duty liability on the clearance was not sustained, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204305</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>