<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 386 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204272</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, remanding the matter to the AO for a fresh determination of the disallowance related to exempt income, consistent with the jurisdictional High Court&#039;s guidelines. The Tribunal emphasized that Rule 8D is not applicable for the assessment year under consideration, but the AO must still determine any related expenditure using a reasonable method.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 11:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177815" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 386 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204272</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, remanding the matter to the AO for a fresh determination of the disallowance related to exempt income, consistent with the jurisdictional High Court&#039;s guidelines. The Tribunal emphasized that Rule 8D is not applicable for the assessment year under consideration, but the AO must still determine any related expenditure using a reasonable method.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204272</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>