<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 503 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204270</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the expenditure incurred for renovating the leased cinema theatre should be treated as revenue expenditure. It held that the expenditure was necessary for effective business operations and did not result in any enduring benefit. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals and confirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s order allowing the expenditure as revenue expenditure, based on legislative provisions and judicial precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 10:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177813" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 503 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204270</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the expenditure incurred for renovating the leased cinema theatre should be treated as revenue expenditure. It held that the expenditure was necessary for effective business operations and did not result in any enduring benefit. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals and confirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s order allowing the expenditure as revenue expenditure, based on legislative provisions and judicial precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204270</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>