<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 258 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204264</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand of Service Tax on detention charges and logistic fee, while reducing the penalty to the amount of Service Tax upheld. The decision was based on the categorization of charges and fees involved, as well as statutory provisions regarding penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 10:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177807" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 258 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204264</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand of Service Tax on detention charges and logistic fee, while reducing the penalty to the amount of Service Tax upheld. The decision was based on the categorization of charges and fees involved, as well as statutory provisions regarding penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204264</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>