<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 348 - ITAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204251</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, finding that the notice u/s 148 was not served within the statutory limitation period, rendering the assessment unsustainable. As a result, the Tribunal did not address the other issues raised by the appellant, such as the justification of the reopening of assessment, the addition of unexplained gifts, or the charging of interest. The decision was pronounced in favor of the assessee on 14th January 2011.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 00:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177794" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 348 - ITAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204251</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, finding that the notice u/s 148 was not served within the statutory limitation period, rendering the assessment unsustainable. As a result, the Tribunal did not address the other issues raised by the appellant, such as the justification of the reopening of assessment, the addition of unexplained gifts, or the charging of interest. The decision was pronounced in favor of the assessee on 14th January 2011.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204251</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>