<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 75 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204241</link>
    <description>Imported used computer systems and laptops cannot be treated as hazardous waste or e-waste for confiscation unless that character is established by a competent authority under the governing environmental framework. A Chartered Engineer&#039;s report, by itself, was insufficient where it was not issued by a notified or competent authority and did not show that the consignment was hazardous; the report indicated that most goods were reusable and only a small portion was non-functional. Confiscation on the basis of hazardous-waste classification was therefore unsustainable. The matter was remanded only for limited reconsideration of compliance with paragraph 2.17 of the Foreign Trade Policy and the consequential duty, fine, and penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 15:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177784" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 75 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204241</link>
      <description>Imported used computer systems and laptops cannot be treated as hazardous waste or e-waste for confiscation unless that character is established by a competent authority under the governing environmental framework. A Chartered Engineer&#039;s report, by itself, was insufficient where it was not issued by a notified or competent authority and did not show that the consignment was hazardous; the report indicated that most goods were reusable and only a small portion was non-functional. Confiscation on the basis of hazardous-waste classification was therefore unsustainable. The matter was remanded only for limited reconsideration of compliance with paragraph 2.17 of the Foreign Trade Policy and the consequential duty, fine, and penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204241</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>