<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 70 - ITAT, HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204223</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) erred in applying the principle of mutuality to exempt interest income from fixed deposits in banks. It was determined that the income derived from external sources like banks did not fall under the mutuality principle. Therefore, the revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the interest income was deemed taxable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2011 00:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177766" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 70 - ITAT, HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204223</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) erred in applying the principle of mutuality to exempt interest income from fixed deposits in banks. It was determined that the income derived from external sources like banks did not fall under the mutuality principle. Therefore, the revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the interest income was deemed taxable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204223</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>