https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204221 The Madras High Court, in a case concerning Customs and Central Excise, addressed delays in the adjudication process by the respondent. Despite the petitioner's Writ Petition seeking a Writ of Mandamus for completion within a specified timeframe, the respondent had not filed a counter for almost three years. The court criticized the lack of representation from the Department of Customs and emphasized the need for timely adjudication. The court directed the respondent to complete the process within four weeks, highlighting the importance of proper and prompt adjudication in such cases. en-us Thu, 18 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Jul 2011 16:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204221 The Madras High Court, in a case concerning Customs and Central Excise, addressed delays in the adjudication process by the respondent. Despite the petitioner's Writ Petition seeking a Writ of Mandamus for completion within a specified timeframe, the respondent had not filed a counter for almost three years. The court criticized the lack of representation from the Department of Customs and emphasized the need for timely adjudication. The court directed the respondent to complete the process within four weeks, highlighting the importance of proper and prompt adjudication in such cases. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 18 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204221