https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204220 Availability of a statutory appeal did not create an absolute bar to writ or supervisory jurisdiction; the High Court could still exercise Articles 226 and 227 within the limits of judicial review, and the petition was entertained as maintainable. Where the assessee produced no material to prove lawful import and the Tribunal reversed concurrent findings without reasons, the non-speaking order was unsustainable. The reasoned order restoring confiscation, redemption fine, and the reduced penalty was therefore reinstated. en-us Fri, 05 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 May 2026 15:34:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204220 Availability of a statutory appeal did not create an absolute bar to writ or supervisory jurisdiction; the High Court could still exercise Articles 226 and 227 within the limits of judicial review, and the petition was entertained as maintainable. Where the assessee produced no material to prove lawful import and the Tribunal reversed concurrent findings without reasons, the non-speaking order was unsustainable. The reasoned order restoring confiscation, redemption fine, and the reduced penalty was therefore reinstated. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 05 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204220