<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 64 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204210</link>
    <description>An appeal dismissed for non-compliance with a stay order may be restored where the appellant makes the required deposit and the Revenue raises no objection; on that basis, the earlier dismissal was recalled and the appeal restored. A dispute on MODVAT credit taken on the basis of fake and fictitious invoices was treated as covered by an earlier Tribunal ruling on similar facts, so the impugned order was set aside and the matter remanded to the original adjudicating authority for de-novo consideration in light of that precedent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2011 00:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177753" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 64 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204210</link>
      <description>An appeal dismissed for non-compliance with a stay order may be restored where the appellant makes the required deposit and the Revenue raises no objection; on that basis, the earlier dismissal was recalled and the appeal restored. A dispute on MODVAT credit taken on the basis of fake and fictitious invoices was treated as covered by an earlier Tribunal ruling on similar facts, so the impugned order was set aside and the matter remanded to the original adjudicating authority for de-novo consideration in light of that precedent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204210</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>