<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 368 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204207</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, a 100% EOU engaged in Scientific Testing and Consultancy Services, in a refund claim dispute over unutilized Cenvat credit of Service Tax. The Tribunal emphasized the need for authorities to base decisions on the show-cause notice&#039;s allegations and defense presented. It highlighted a retrospective amendment to Notification 5/2006-C.E. allowing refunds for services used in providing exported output services. The Tribunal directed a fresh consideration by the adjudicating authority, stressing adherence to Natural Justice principles and the retrospective amendment. The lower authorities&#039; orders were set aside, and the matter was remanded for reevaluation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 12:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177750" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 368 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204207</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, a 100% EOU engaged in Scientific Testing and Consultancy Services, in a refund claim dispute over unutilized Cenvat credit of Service Tax. The Tribunal emphasized the need for authorities to base decisions on the show-cause notice&#039;s allegations and defense presented. It highlighted a retrospective amendment to Notification 5/2006-C.E. allowing refunds for services used in providing exported output services. The Tribunal directed a fresh consideration by the adjudicating authority, stressing adherence to Natural Justice principles and the retrospective amendment. The lower authorities&#039; orders were set aside, and the matter was remanded for reevaluation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204207</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>