<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 537 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204206</link>
    <description>Partial pre-deposit was treated as sufficient for admission and disposal of the appeal, so the Tribunal waived the balance pre-deposit and stayed recovery of the disputed demand pending final decision. The order was confined to procedural relief and did not decide the underlying taxability issue concerning commercial training or coaching services, including reliance on the CBEC circular, or the proposed penalties under sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 12:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177749" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 537 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204206</link>
      <description>Partial pre-deposit was treated as sufficient for admission and disposal of the appeal, so the Tribunal waived the balance pre-deposit and stayed recovery of the disputed demand pending final decision. The order was confined to procedural relief and did not decide the underlying taxability issue concerning commercial training or coaching services, including reliance on the CBEC circular, or the proposed penalties under sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204206</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>