<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 497 - ITAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204202</link>
    <description>The appeals in all three cases were dismissed as the assessees failed to provide sufficient evidence to establish the genuineness of the gifts received, including proof of creditworthiness of donors and the nature of relationships. The Tribunal upheld the decisions, emphasizing the onus on the assessees to prove the authenticity of the gifts and highlighting the significance of meeting the burden of proof in such matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 12:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177745" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 497 - ITAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204202</link>
      <description>The appeals in all three cases were dismissed as the assessees failed to provide sufficient evidence to establish the genuineness of the gifts received, including proof of creditworthiness of donors and the nature of relationships. The Tribunal upheld the decisions, emphasizing the onus on the assessees to prove the authenticity of the gifts and highlighting the significance of meeting the burden of proof in such matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204202</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>