<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 8 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204189</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeal and confirming that the High Court was justified in refusing to expand the scope of the reference. The confiscation of silver weighing 194.250 kgs. under Section 120(2) was deemed illegal due to the lack of a show cause notice, violating principles of natural justice. The appeal was dismissed, and parties were left to bear their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 16:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177733" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 8 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204189</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeal and confirming that the High Court was justified in refusing to expand the scope of the reference. The confiscation of silver weighing 194.250 kgs. under Section 120(2) was deemed illegal due to the lack of a show cause notice, violating principles of natural justice. The appeal was dismissed, and parties were left to bear their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204189</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>