<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 195 - ITAT, Mumbai</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204176</link>
    <description>The Tribunal overturned the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to disallow a portion of the Director&#039;s salary under Section 40A(2)(b) of the IT Act for assessment year 2006-07. The Tribunal found the Director&#039;s responsibilities justified the salary, emphasizing the legitimate business needs served by the Director&#039;s role. The Tribunal ruled that the salary was not excessive or unreasonable, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the disallowed amount and allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 00:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177720" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 195 - ITAT, Mumbai</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204176</link>
      <description>The Tribunal overturned the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to disallow a portion of the Director&#039;s salary under Section 40A(2)(b) of the IT Act for assessment year 2006-07. The Tribunal found the Director&#039;s responsibilities justified the salary, emphasizing the legitimate business needs served by the Director&#039;s role. The Tribunal ruled that the salary was not excessive or unreasonable, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the disallowed amount and allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204176</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>